Monday, September 17, 2007

Christ and Christianity

I was talking about witnessing with a buddy who shared that he didn't think the person to whom I was witnessing was "looking for Christianity." I found that phrase interesting, because that's not what I was trying to do at all. I was not sharing Christianity. I was trying to share Christ. While to some the two may seem redundant, that got me thinking about Christ and Christianity and how that distinction informs what it means to be The River.

Being down on Christianity as an institution is becoming quite popular these days. Folks everywhere are coming to terms with the decline of the church as a center of community life. Some choose to fight for it to return there. Others look for a different way. I include myself in the second category. As I have tried to rediscover what it means to be church in this new culture, I have been very hard on the institutional church. My belief for awhile was that the whole concept of institutional church was bad, and it needed to be thrown out entirely.
If you're paying close attention, you may have even noticed that it's just The River. Not "The River Church" or "The River Lutheran Church" even though I am a Lutheran, we are part of a Lutheran denomination, and our theology is Lutheran. That was an intentional choice to show that we are seeking to be something different, something unlike other Christian communities around town.

My friend Mike has since helped me see the value in institutional churches. You can read his article here. It's very good stuff, and helped me rethink a lot of my views. Meanwhile, as we have continued to get the word out, I have found that taking the word church out has created some confusion. Folks don't know what we are. Church comes with baggage, that's for sure. But not using that word has baggage too. And that's just one word! What to do?

I'm thinking it goes back to that conversation about sharing Christ. We are not sharing Christianity, with it's rules and property and billboards and whatnot. We share Christ. My efforts in witnessing and reaching out are focused solely in that direction, and those of others as well. Moreover, I think Christ is what people are looking for. I think Christ is what people need. They don't need to be members or an impressive building or any of that stuff. They need Christ, and that is what we are sharing.

As I look down the road, though, I now think we will probably build an institution of some type. In some ways, it will be different from the institutional church of today. In some ways, it will probably be maddeningly similar. But the goal is not to build the institution. The goal is to share Christ. That is the goal. The institution is a way to do that, a way to share Christ with each other and experience Christ together. It is a means to an end. It is not to be shared itself, because it is not the point. The institution is the boat on which we journey down the river that is God.

So maybe we add "Church" after "The River," or that we build a nice building with a sign out front. Who knows. I don't. But I do think that if we can keep Christ as the focus rather than Christianity, we'll be all right because we are keeping first things first. The institution isn't bad any more than river rafts are bad. It has a purpose, and instead of throwing it out we'll just be careful to use it how it's meant to be used: a way to share Christ. Because that really is what it's all about.

3 Comments:

At 9:13 AM, September 18, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The River of Christ?

 
At 8:01 PM, September 25, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think it's hard to draw a clear line between following Christ and being a Christian. While some educated persons will be able to make this distinction, the two are irrevocably connected in the minds of most people, myself included. Christ Followers will constantly have to distance themselves from the established church in any discourse, and it is frustrating to constantly be drawn back to the same old issues when you have long since moved on to new questions.

The Bible itself only allows us to understand Christ through the eyes of early Christians, and being able to sort through the non-canonical texts and emerge with something useful takes a serious amount of study and historical context.

So while following the philosophy of Christ doesn't come with the same problems as traditional Christianity does (or nearly as many, for that matter) I think it does have baggage of its own that one might easily prefer to avoid.

 
At 7:39 AM, September 26, 2007, Blogger River Pastor said...

I agree. I have been looking for an approach without baggage and found that there isn't one.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home